|
:: I am back from Toronto and Kitchener. Tomorrow I drive to Calgary to attend the CLA Conference. The week in Ontario was fun, rewarding, and very busy. It was also stiflingly hot and muggy, with temperatures hovering between 30-35C every day (86-95F), high humidity, with smog alerts issued daily in Toronto. I had a wonderful visit with my Great Auntie Anne, whom I had not seen since I was too young to remember. I spent two days in Kitchener visiting my friends, Jason and Brenda, also a very nice and relaxing time. More on the trip later.
:: Interesting interactive quiz about Canada from the Globe and Mail, called What Canadians Think About Everything. I scored 14/20. Damn that heartbreak question.
show comments right here »
Hm. I got 9 out of 20...the ones I got right were mostly political. Does that mean I can be Canadian yet? Socialized medicine, here I come!
Posted by Linda on June 15, 2005 06:24 AM
Jo's at CLA. Maybe you'll bump into her.
D
Posted by Murph on June 15, 2005 10:02 AM
Damn! 10 out of 20! And I got the hearbreak one!
Posted by Michael Hall on June 15, 2005 08:59 PM
I tried the quiz for kicks and I got 8/20. Considering that I am 12 hours away, it's not too bad, is it? Maybe I should start packing for Canada. (btw, i got the heartbreak question right)
Posted by sharon on June 16, 2005 07:42 PM
All I got was 8 out of 20. Not living in Canada I sure miss a lot of news. I did get the heartbreak question, I have driven across Sask and that can break your heart. I still suffer from that trip to Regina back in the 70's. That open prairie stuff will kill you. It makes you crazy, you can see it on Brent Butt's show.
Posted by Garth Danielson on June 17, 2005 03:53 PM
12 out of 20.
And I like driving in the prairies! That's what you get for being born there, I guess ;)
Posted by Darcy on June 30, 2005 09:14 AM
« hide comments
:: Today is the last day of the SLA Conference in Toronto. It's been interminably hot, and I've had four morning meetings in a row beginning at 0730, 0730, 0730 and 0700 hrs. I've had a good time, an exhausting time, it's been great to see old friend, and make a few new ones. Anyway, I was leaving the final morning meeting an hour ago, and while walking towards the general conference meeting area, noticed a fellow conference attendee walking in the opposite direction towards me, apparently holding something in her hands. As I got closer, I realized that she was knitting while she was walking.
It's bad enough that occasionally in sessions at library conferences, I notice the occasional audience member knitting, quietly adding to the staid, dowdy stereotype image of the librarian, that of loving only cats, books, and wool. But while they're walking? Good grief. Can you say obsessed? Can you say addiction?
I have nothing against knitting (or cats or books for that matter.) Some of my dearest and best friends knit. My grandmother knitted me Christmas bells. But enough already! I'm sorry, but while attending and participating at a professional conference, knitting is inappropriate, and unprofessional.
That sound you hear is me banging my head against the desk in my hotel room.
show comments right here »
Aww man, and here I was thinking of bringing my knitting today.
Seriously: I don't think it looks professional either, but I considered bringing it today because I'm so sick of sitting and it helps me keep from fidgeting. And I sat beside a knitter the other day and learned a new technique, which was nice, but perhaps not the point of the Technology Petting Zoo program.
So I left my knitting at the hotel. With the dumplins.
Posted by Oelker on June 8, 2005 08:43 AM
oh dear. the knitting-at-conferences discussion seems to come up every once in a while... I personally don't have any problem with people knitting at sessions (I've had someone knit at a talk I gave and had no reaction to it whatsoever) and realize that some people have that certain cognitive thing where they absorb more while their hands are busy. But I certainly can see the other side of it too, especially the bit about it being disrespectful to the speaker (although the unprofessional thing is a bit of a stretch for me).
But, now, the adding-to-the-staid-stereotype thing...! Well, Randy! Knitting is trendy now! It has been for a few years, thanks in large part to Deb Stoller, editor of Bust magazine & knitter extraordinaire!
Cats, however, are a lost cause.
Posted by amanda on June 8, 2005 10:03 AM
Well...perhaps I'm overreacting. Amanda, to be sure, I LOVE the stuff you knit, I am in awe of your abilities. And indeed knitting is popular, and it's a skill I envy. Sarah, I imagine your stuff is top-notch too (but I haven't seen any photos!)
But consider this: is there any fundamental difference between me bringing a guitar to a session and playing it, while listening to the speaker, and someone bringing knitting? Or if I was an artist, bringing a sketchbook, etc etc etc? Of course, I'd be making a lot of noise and distracting others at the session (even if I played really, really quietly.) I guess I see it this way: when I attend a session, I try to do my best to give the presenters my full attention. It doesn't work all the time, I'll get distracted, or bored with a presenter or presentation at times. If I'm presenting and see someone knitting or playing a Gameboy or whatever, the message I'm getting is, "hey, I'm here for your presentation at least in body, what more do you want? Notetaking?"
It's like, I won't bring my guitar, because it makes noise, but it's acceptable to bringing knitting needles, because they don't make any noise.
Look, maybe I'm overreacting, and I so, I apologize. I love you guys and don't want to alienate my knitting friends. Whatever. Call me cranky and tired...
Meanwhile, I hope the two of you keep knitting and sewing up a storm, because it's creative and interesting and rewarding and satisfying to do so. Plus, friends like me really admire your talents.
Amanda, we SO missed you at SLA...
Posted by randy on June 8, 2005 10:44 AM
« hide comments
:: Everything continues to move at a fast pace. Tonight I blew away Norton Internet Security 2005, despite having paid for a full year's subscription. I'd grown tired of its increasing sluggishness, error messages, and for the past couple days, preventing me from connecting to my ISP. I replaced it with avast!, at the suggestion of Geoff. I've been running Microsoft AntiSpyware, which seems to function quite well as a firewall for now. The only thing I don't like about avast! so far is that it unleashes a siren sound, followed by a woman's voice saying, "Warning, there is a virus on your computer"; however, I could turn the sound off, but for now, I'm still learning how to use it.
:: I am pleased to report the publication of an article1 co-authored by your humble correspondent and the amazing Geoff Harder, my friend and colleague (on the other side of the wall in my office). The article, "Weblogs: Their Use and Application in Science and Technology Libraries", briefly covers the history of blogs and considers how they can be put to good use in the science and technology library setting:
Weblogs, or blogs, emerged in the late 1990s on the Web, quickly becoming a new way to communicate ideas, opinions, resources and news. Since that time, the community of blogs has grown to encompass specific subject areas of study and research. This article briefly discusses the history and background of blogs, including blogging software. Literature searches suggest very little has been published on subject-specific blogs in scientific and technical publications. Applications in science and technology librarianship are discussed, including team and project management, reference work, current awareness, and the librarian as blog mentor for students.Please note that my work e-mail address listed in the article and on the Haworth web site is incorrect, and should read randy.reichardt@ualberta.ca.
I've written or co-written a small number of articles in my professional life, but this is the first peer-reviewed article I've had published, which is a nice accomplishment, if I may be so bold.
1. Reichardt, Randy and Geoffrey Harder. 2005. "Weblogs: Their Use and Application in Science and Technology Libraries." Science & Technology Libraries, 25(3), p105-116.
Update: The pdf version of the article is here.
show comments right here »
nicely done on the co-authoring and publication! It's always good to plonk a feather in one's cap thusly. It's kind of funny, actually - I read this entry while hacking through sources for a short essay on blogs for my Theories of Reading class. Hee! It's such a fun topic...
Posted by Lauren on April 9, 2005 12:40 PM
« hide comments
:: Word is out that President Bill Clinton has been added to the list of general session speakers at SLA in Toronto. From a post on SLA-ENG today:
This morning it was announced to the Board, that former President Bill Clinton recently agreed to be a general session speaker for the SLA Toronto meeting. He will speak on Wednesday morning , from 9:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. This is really exciting news! We wanted the conference planners to be among the first to hear. Promotional and PR Information is being developed and will be sent out as soon as we are able to the entire membership. We do not foresee this conflicting with any division programming, except as mentioned earlier, Wednesday morning sessions will now begin at 7:00 a.m.
show comments right here »
I stumbled across your site searching for more Bill info. I'm the Librarian at PricewaterhouseCoopers Calgary, who's also looking forward to SLA in TO
Great site!
Posted by Kelsey on March 24, 2005 02:47 PM
« hide comments
:: This is work-related, but I'll share it with you anyway. The March/April 2005, v3 n1 issue of Ei Update is available for viewing, featuring updates on faceted searching and the forthcoming study: Role of Information in Innovation 2005. Ei is Engineering Information in Hoboken NJ, the company that produces the Compendex database, which indexes and abstracts the important engineering literature of the world. Some of you may remember the many trips I took to NYC between 1993 and 1998, all of which were to attend a committee meeting at Ei's offices in Hoboken, followed by a few days of hanging out in Manhattan.
The Librarian's Corner for this issue of the Update was written my your humble engineering librarian-type weblogger, and is called RSS: Moving Into the Mainstream.
:: As my friend Tony Dalmyn noted, I didn't include a link to Michael Gorman's original column in the LA Times, Google and God's Mind, in the previous post about his Library Journal column about blogs, so there it is. I mention this because I want to draw your attention to a new blog, Quædam cuiusdam by esteemed colleague Peter Binkley, Digital Initiatives Project Librarian at the University of Alberta, in which he offers an insightful, informed and educated response to Gorman's take on the Google project. Peter works on Peel's Prairie Provinces, a major digitization project to enhance and improve access to the history of the Canadian prairie provinces:
Peel's Prairie Provinces is a resource dedicated to assisting scholars, students, and researchers of all types in their exploration of the history and culture of the Canadian Prairies. The site contains both an online bibliography of books, pamphlets, and other materials related to the development of the Prairies and a fully searchable collection of the full texts of many of these items. As of September 2004, the Peel bibliographic database holds some 7,200 titles, approximately 2,500 of which have already been rendered in digital form and mounted on the Web site. These materials are extremely varied in terms of their content and provide an extraordinarily diverse picture of the Prairie experience. These items date back to the earliest days of exploration in the region and include a vast range of material dealing with every aspect of the settlement and development of the Canadian West. These sources are also highly diverse in regard to the cultural experiences that they reflect. Although English-language titles predominate, the databases contain a very substantial body of materials in French, Ukrainian, and numerous other languages.
The project is based on resources documented in Peel's Bibliography of the Canadian Prairies. Gorman calls digitization projects "expensive exercises in futility", easily interpreted by Peter as "wasting my time." Scholars working in this area would beg to differ. Tony notes that Google "is a dumb brute which brings up lots of commercial and promotional sites and lots of oddball sites on any given search." Fair enough, but it's here to stay and is indexing scholarly material (such as IEEE Xplore, for example), and thus providing access to thousands of peer-reviewed publications (among others), including the full-text, if the user is on an IP-authenticated computer. Students are using it before any proprietary, scholarly database more often than not. Librarians face the task on a daily basis of informing students of the scholary datatabases available to them in addition to, but not necessarily in lieu of, Google.
That said, with the advent of Google Scholar, as mentioned, anyone can run a search and receive dozens, hundreds of citations to publications found in scholary journals, conferences, etc. Someone working in electrical engineering can run their search on the IEEE db, run the same seach on Google Scholar, and receive more results, because other scholarly publications are indexed there besides the IEEE db.
Perhaps Mr Gorman needs to rethink his dismissal of Google's archiving project, drop the nasty tone ("Boogie woogie Google boys"? - give me a break), and revisit the issue. I wonder, is he upset because Google is undertaking something libraries might have be doing themselves, rather than in partnership with Google?
Discussion will continue. Mr Gorman's dismissal of weblogs, subsequent to his criticism of the Google digitization project, is ironic, given the interesting and thought-provoking discourse that has followed on so many of them. For that reason, he is to be genuinely thanked - many librarians and others outside the field are engaged in valuable debate as a result. Read Barbara Fister's "Google's Digitization Project - What Difference Will It Make?", in Library Issues, v25 n4, March 2005, for another perspective. Now I have to get back to work. (As posted to STLQ.)
:: My mind has been elsewhere for the past few days, for reasons known to some of you. Here in Edmonton, a few days of grey skies and wet, clammy weather ended today, with that bright, shiny thing called Sol beaming light and warmth on the city, improving everyones' moods.
I spent part of today at the TELUS Centre, where NanoForum Canada is being held. As one of the engineering librarians, building and maintaining the UA Libraries' collections in nanoscience and nanotechnology is my responsibility. NINT, The National Institute for Nanotechnology, is housed on our campus, and will move into its own building when construction is completed in 2005. At this time, faculty from at least nineteen different departments on campus are working and/or have research interests in nano-whatever.
It would be interesting to prepare a list of all the new words entering the language that begin with the prefix "nano". Today I learned two new ones: nanorosette, and nanostencil. No, "Nanook" doesn't count. A rosette is a six-membered supermacrocycle. Rosette nanotubes that self-assemble could be used as tiny scaffolds. The chemist leading this area of research is Hicham Fenniri, formerly of Purdue, but now working at the U of A as a chemisty professor and a NINT researcher.
:: With Geoff Harder, I maintain another blog, STLQ. I was pleased to learn that STLQ has received some press of late. Stephen Abram mentions STLQ in the latest issue of Information Outlook, and the blog was highlighted twice, once in a brief review, in the latest issue of SciTech News, the newsletter of a number of SLA divisions.
:: Jenny mentioned a new book out this month that I think will be worth reading, especially since I'm old enough to have lived through the period in question. The book is Kill Your Idols: A New Generation of Rock Writers Reconsiders the Classics, Edited by Jim DeRogatis and Carmél Carrillo:
Kill Your Idols is a collection of 34 essays in which some of the best rock critics of Generations X and Y address allegedly “great” albums that they despise. This anthology is every bit as thoughtful, provocative, entertaining, and valuable as Stranded, but it also returns some vital, stimulating debate to the canon of rock and roll history. Kill Your Idols is a spirited assault on a pantheon that has been foisted upon this new generation of music critics, a defiant slap in the face to the narrow and hegemonic view of rock history presented by the Baby Boom generation’s critics. As a collection of the new generation of rock writers, it is the first of its kind, as well as the first and only anthology devoted solely to critiquing rock and roll’s most sacred cows.Nothing like insurgents kicking dust in the face of the old guard. Go for it, I say. Some of the albums ripped apart by these young lions include The Beatles, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, The Beach Boys, Pet Sounds, The Rolling Stones, Exile on Main Street, The Sex Pistols, Never Mind the Bollocks . . . Here’s the Sex Pistols, and U2, The Joshua Tree. Will it be informed criticism, or Gen X whining? The foreword is available, as are a few reviews.
:: Hello from Nashville. Arrived yesterday on time, spent the evening hanging with a number of good friends, and made a few new ones as well. Watched the Flames game from a sports bar in the Gaylord Opryland, the largest hotel complex I have ever seen in my life. As usual with this conference, I am already running on empty, which means the more caffeine, the more awake and alert I shall be. Attended an academic librarians roundtable this morning (0730 hrs *groan*), but do not have a meeting until 1600 hrs this afternoon.
show comments right here »
Have fun. Report on Nashville *after* you get back, okay? Forget this instant blogging for a while....
Posted by Keith (Just Another Pseudonym) on June 7, 2004 06:59 PM
« hide comments
:: Today in our library, a student was attacked and stabbed in the arm and shoulder by three other individuals, while studying on the second floor. Most of us working in the building weren't aware anything had happened until afterwards. The student apparently bolted from the library, bleeding profusely. Soon afterwards, Campus Security, the Edmonton Police, and other officials were in the building. Currently, a section of the entrance, and the second floor, are sealed off as a crime scene. The incident made the local news, and a statement was issued by the University. In addition, the students on campus are already discussing it online.
The event and its aftermath left most of us feeling a bit unsettled. In my 25+ years as a librarian, I've never experienced anything like this.
Update on 18 March 2004: The Edmonton Journal story has been removed from their website, so here's an account of what happened from the UA Student newspaper, The Gateway.
show comments right here »
I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU HAVE PHOTOS OF THE BLOOD ALREADY, RANDY! HAHAHAHAHHAHAH
err.. or maybe not so hahahaha :-/
Kel
Posted by kelly on March 9, 2004 04:58 PM
Yah, actually, it wasn't very funny, Kel. Some of the people working in the building were quite rattled, and the students who were around the fellow who was attacked were numbed by the incident. Most couldn't believe what had happened, and many of them left the building with blood on their clothes, as the victim (apparently) left immediately, but as you can see from the pic, was bleeding badly. Many of the chairs, tables and carrels on the 2nd floor had blood on them as well.
A disturbing incident. Most of us on the first floor couldn't focus on our work for the balance of the day. (But I know you meant well!) R
Posted by randy on March 9, 2004 07:49 PM
I was just more amazed at the power of the internet in it's lightning quick speed at getting photos and info about the crime up.
I did a search online at 2pm and could not find anything about it at that time. When I got home later in the day around 5, the Provost's message was up and you had the posting. Behold the power of blogs!
Posted by kelly on March 9, 2004 10:25 PM
Hope the student's OK, and indeed the staff. Thinking about you all.
Posted by Morrie on March 10, 2004 01:52 AM
A stabbing in a library. It just defies belief. No one can say the position of librarian is boring any more, not that they ever did, of course.
Anyone there trained in first aid? Anyone now considering it?
Good work on the photos - are you releasing them to the police?
Posted by Morpheus on March 10, 2004 09:32 AM
The police and campus security have my contact info if they want the photos. Some staff are trained in first aid, but the injured student left the building before anyone knew what was happening.
Posted by randy on March 10, 2004 10:14 AM
As Dave Chapelle would say, "Welcome to the new big-ass violent world, bitch. Here's your gun, good luck to ya." Of course I am a sarcastic bastard who lives in the USA and we all used to that here. Matter o'fact I am surprized that it doesn't happen more often. Constant repetition of violence in movies and tv and music and my neighbors house gets me all hot and murderin' like. Course I have a superior brain and I know I can't shoot or stab people where someone might see it. Unfortunately it seems that even college students are stupid enough to do their violence in the library. I bet "Reading is fundemental" never occured to them. I hate these lack of education enjoying mothers. Any misspellings on my part don't refect my education but my own lazyness to go look some shit up. You should get a spell checker module for this.
I read the posting by the students. I like the cat with the gun. I can't deceide if that is a political statement or a call for help. I wonder how good a cats eyesight is from the fifth floor of the book depository.
Perhaps if you ever move to New York you can enjoy a firefight on the subway some time in the future. My co-worker here in Minneapolis lives in one of the worst parts of Minneapolis and they had so many shootings and killings a couple of weeks ago that the Mayor and the Chief of Police came down to try to talk everyone to killing people over in St Paul, since it's been so much quieter there of late.
Posted by Garth Danielson on March 10, 2004 10:33 AM
Garth, thanks for the comment. It hasn't been determined if the three assailants were students. One other student commented in another blog that a friend of hers noticed these three guys "plotting" on the same floor, before the attack happened. Weird and wacky, and not something expected in an institution of higher learning. Then again, incidents like these are not restricted to any one segment of society, are they?
Posted by randy on March 10, 2004 11:49 AM
It's funny because I said the same thing to some friends of mine, that "I'm surprised this doesn't happen more often" since our campus is well over 30,000 strong now. We've had random events, like rape attacks, another slashing (maybe a shooting?) during the first week of school in 1998, an engineer trying to take a lecture hall hostage two years ago... anyhow, my friends were a bit shocked that I said what I did, but it's true. There are thousands of 'smart' students on campus, but just as many are tangled up in gangs or drugs or criminal acts, and I really am surprised there aren't more gang blowouts.
Posted by kelly on March 10, 2004 12:43 PM
Well, I tell you if there is one thing I learned from Buffy the Vampire Slayer, you just aren't safe anywhere, even if you don't live over a hellmouth. Since campus's aren't that restricted anyone could just wander in and wreck havoc. The Univ. of Minnesota campus here had a riot last year, where cars were burnt and store windows were bust up. Actualy it wasn't on the campus but across the street, after a sports victory. Back then DreamHaven had a store in Dinkytown and their garbage dumpster was burnt, luckily the building didn't catch fire. Want to learn more...
http://news.mpr.org/features/2003/04/14_olsond_riotfolo/
There was a smaller one on a U of M campus in Mankato, which is south of here.
I was just thinking that those guys, who indeed might not be students, weren't thinking that reading is fundemental but that stabbing is fun and mental.
There is a long way to go to get past this kind of thinking and I surely have no answers, I can barely conceptulize all the problems that got us here in the first place. I just know I rarely want anything stuck into me.
Posted by Garth Danielson on March 10, 2004 02:04 PM
One of my best male friends went to the U of M and I have spent many a day wandering in Dinkytown and on campus, exploring it. It felt no different (if slightly bigger and prettier and more collegiate) than the U of A campus.
I think that these sorts of things are just built out of circumstance and the fact that when you get that many people together, the only thing that is predictable is that there will be unpredictability.
Posted by kelly on March 10, 2004 03:11 PM
What I find interesting, and maybe missed it in the various reports, is how did the victim get out of thet library? Is there no-one near the exits at the library who could have stopped him & called for an ambulance / campus cops / provided a bit of first aid?
Posted by Doug Morton on March 11, 2004 07:27 AM
Doug: No one is near our exits, they are "open", i.e., they do not have turnstile mechanisms - you just walk through. There are detectors which flash and make a noise if you try to leave with an item that wasn't checked out. Apparently the student got up immediately, and began walking out quickly. I followed the trail of blood, it led from the attack area, across the second floor to the stairwell, down the stairs to the library entrance, and out into the next building.
Posted by randy on March 11, 2004 09:30 AM
We were further discussing in class today "Why didn't anyone stop the 3 guys who attacked the other guy?"
It's all a bit odd. I guess it comes down to the fact that you really don't think things like this would happen in a library and when they do, everything moves in slow motion.
Posted by kelly on March 11, 2004 10:22 PM
« hide comments
:: Found on Hilary's site:
- Seattle's new Central Library, opening in May, 2004, is truly on the cutting edge of technology these days. In addition to wireless service available anywhere in the 11-story building, staff will use wireless "smart" communication devices a la Star Trek:
To be able to provide reference service from anywhere in a library would be interesting. We wouldn't be restricted to the information desk area when answering a question by phone, and we could move about the floors of the building without losing contact with a customer.
show comments right here »
You just gave me one more reason to love Seattle. That's awesome.
Posted by kelly on March 4, 2004 05:51 PM
The U of Kentucky had phones with wireless headsets for in the reference area when their new main library opened in 1998. They were intended for the librarians to use while at the desk--a question that required the consultation of a work that was not at the desk but in the reference collection, a good 50 feet away, would not require a callback. The headsets were not used, however; a callback is much more professional than having to listen to a librarian hoof it over to the ref stacks and find the right book... "Hang on, passing the J's now... almost there... let's see... M... a-ha, the P's... PA... PN... PR... PS!"
Posted by cindi on March 15, 2004 01:17 PM
Actually, you ought to see if they are tracking devices. I bet that they have this capability. Some hospitals are forcing nurses to wear similar devices so when it all hits the fan, they can prove to the lawyers and insurance companies that Peggy Sue the nurse wasn't sleeping in the break room for x number of hours.
Posted by brock on April 6, 2005 07:32 AM
« hide comments
:: The Directors Guild of America has announced its nominations for Outstanding Directorial Achievement in Feature Film for 2003. One notable absentee is Anthony Minghella, for Cold Mountain. Overall, it hasn't been the best year for film. Sales of tickets in the USA dropped for the first time since 1991.
:: With the Spirit Rover firmly in place on Mars, the US will now move its search for WMD to the red planet itself. Meanwhile, The Beagle isn't doing too well.
:: The Writers' Union of Canada is "aghast" over cuts to Regina's public library system.
:: I'm a bit cranky tonight. Last night while falling asleep, my right eye began bothering me. This morning I woke to a burning feeling in said right eye, and it has yet to subside. I know, I should have it examined.
:: I was at the Netspeed 2003 conference today in Edmonton, and attended a number of interesting sessions, including ones covering virtual reference services, and PDAs in the library. One of the keynote speakers, Ian Whitten, currently the iCore Visiting Professor at U Lethbridge, and Director of the NZ Digital Library at the University of Waikato in New Zealand, discussed Greenstone Digital Library Software, a suite of open-source software used to build and digitize library collections. During his engaging and at time hilarious talk, he showed us examples of digitized collections created with Greenstone, including this page on castration from Basic Husbandry Practices and Veterinary Care. (The foreword of the book states: "The manuals are based upon experiences documented through a series of intensive field work activities over a one-year period with a group of livestock small-holders living and working in Cavite province of the Philippines.")
Note the picture of the farmer tossing the animal testicles onto a roof of made of galvanized iron. This is an indigenous practice done on hot days, as the belief is that the testicles will dry up faster, and thus so will the wound to the animal.
The attentive crowd watching Ian, myself included, had just finished eating lunch at this point in time.
:: I've been playing around with Blogger sites again, ones I've created to keep myself familiar with how to set up an instant blog on that site. Among these sites is my original blog from July 2002. I need to maintain familiarity so that I might sound somewhat intelligent and coherent when G and I present blogging sessions in the not-too-distant future. As some of you might notice, I'm also experimenting with the font size and styles here as well.
show comments right here »
The new font style is too difficult to read (personal opinion).
Posted by cdc on October 24, 2003 11:29 PM
I think I agree, so I've changed it from Garamond to Trebuchet MS, which I like better.
Posted by randy on October 25, 2003 12:38 AM
I prefered the original (the original original, not the Garamond), but I like this size for these ancient old eyes... :)
Posted by Jena on October 25, 2003 11:38 AM
« hide comments
:: I experienced two "firsts" today. At work, we began our Librarian On-Site! service. For the first time in my 25-year career as a librarian, I left the library to do information and reference work, and went to where the users "live", on their turf. I set up shop in a large computer lab, and offered consulting to any engineering student or faculty who needed help. It was a lot of fun, especially in the second hour, when a class of chemical engineering design students descended upon me with a propane pricing and chemical property question.
The other "first" was more personal - I was fitted for a hearing aid. Yah, you read that correctly. It's wonderful getting old. I've had a version of low tone conductive deafness in my right ear since 1985 or so. It's never worsened or improved, so my ear doctor suggested I consider a hearing aid. I'm going to try it for a few weeks, and then decide whether or not to purchase (~$1,500Cdn, just a pile of chump change).
A hearing aid. I can't believe I typed those words. It seems to work well most of the time. It doesn't work well with a telephone or headset or headphones, so I'll have to get used to using the phone in my left ear. It has two settings, one for group noise (used in a meeting or a party), and a basic setting for conversation. The device feels ok in my ear, not too much of a bother, and most people I spoke to didn't even notice it. That's cool because it protects a bit of my vanity, but inside, a small part of me is very, very sad.
show comments right here »
A hearing aid.
Wow.
D
Posted by Murph on September 25, 2003 10:11 AM
If you're trying to make me feel bad, it's working. R
Posted by randy on September 25, 2003 04:09 PM
A hearing aid is far less "old" than squinting quizzically at someone and yelling "WHAT? WHAT?" Or worse, missing or completely misinterpreting something important.
Like "You know what I'd really like? If you ."
Eh? Eh? :)
Posted by Jena on September 25, 2003 07:35 PM
Well, geez. It skipped the best part...! That should have read:
"You know what I'd really like? If you (...INDECIPHERABLE...)"
Posted by Jena Snyder on September 25, 2003 07:37 PM
Thanks Jena, and I know all that stuff, inherently. I'm simply not taking well to knowing that I'm getting feckin' old, and my body is crapping out, slowly but surely.
Frankly, that sucks, and is so totally bloody depressing.
Posted by randy on September 25, 2003 11:59 PM
Just keep remembering that you're younger than my ex. And you still know how to rock.
D
Posted by Murph on September 26, 2003 11:05 AM
Hmm. Forgot to correct the link in my Comments area.
D
Posted by Murph on September 26, 2003 11:06 AM
You could use my grandmother's hearing aid. She never uses it....
Posted by Keith on September 29, 2003 10:39 PM
Try bi-focals! When you need to be leaning forward to hear some poor bastard yelling at you, you have the irresistable urge to tilt your head back so that you can stay in focus. Progressive lenses make you sea-sick. It's better to go deaf and not hear what others are saying about your sagging butt....
A bullet to the ol' cabesa is about all that's left.
... well maybe nightsweats....
Posted by Jon on December 24, 2003 04:03 PM
« hide comments
:: More news about the OCLC-Library Hotel lawsuit is emerging. According to the Sept 26 Library Journal Academic Newswire (to which I have no e-access, and which I cannot quote for 60 days according to its redistribution rules, and therefore am paraphrasing), OCLC has tried, for three years, to get the owners of The Library Hotel to sign a simple agreement regarding use of the DDC. The agreement would in effect acknowledge that The Library Hotel's use of the DDC was done with permission of OCLC. The owner of the hotel is a man named Henry Kallan, and according to the OCLC lawyer, Joseph Dreitler, they heard nothing from him for two years. Then, in 2002, Dreitler noted that, "He basically told OCLC to get lost." At the moment, the hotel has denied any wrongdoing, and the General Manager, Craig Spitzer, has advised that Kallan is on vacation and will speak with the press when he returns.
At this point, I think I'm siding with OCLC.
Stay tuned. Who would've thought that the library world could get this exciting? I wonder what Melvil would do? Why doesn't OCLC have a press release about this on their web site? And what's up with the Library Hotel Erotica Package, and its special Erotic Literature Room? Mmm...classify that under, "rrrrrrrrrrr".
:: Randy Cohen writes perhaps my favorite column, The Ethicist (ID and PW: podbay), for the NYTimes Magazine. He is the author of The Good, The Bad & The Difference: How to Tell Right From Wrong in Everyday Situations. In the Sept 7, 2003, issue of the NYTimes Magazine, he responded to a question from a high school student regarding the use of online resources at a university attended by her brother, by using his password to gain access. I work at a university with a large number of online resources, and wonder how often this happens, since we are unable to patrol who actually is using passwords when off campus. Here is the question and Cohen's response:
A: If the library access your brother offered was, as I gather, unauthorized, then it wasn't his to offer, and it certainly wasn't yours to accept. (He's not allowed to swipe college office supplies and send them to you, either. Too bad, I know. But that's ethics for you.) Were he to have done the research for you -- something rare in the annals of big brotherhood -- that wouldn't change things. His library privileges, presumably, permit him to do his own work, not to set up a reference service. That he pays a lot of tuition is beside the point: those who shoulder Ivy prices must obey the rules, too.
What's more, the university could indeed lose if all students passed along their passwords to reference-hungry relatives. An overloaded system with delays for legit users is no boon to higher learning. But even if the school doesn't lose, you'd be on shaky moral ground. Yours is the same rationalization of those who hook up their own cable TV's or sneak onto the subway (or, more rarely, hook up their own cable TV's on the subway). For these services to be sustained -- libraries, HBO or IRT -- each user must pay his or her fair share.
On the bright side, there are many fine public libraries right there in Florida (if the Legislature hasn't cut their budget), as well as many publicly accessible sites for online research.
Cohen, Randy. The way we live now: 9-7-03: the ethicist - nuclear strategy. New York Times Magazine, Sept 7, 2003, p28.
show comments right here »
Obviously the Ivy schools and the UofA are different than little ol' UNBC, which was founded as a community university with all of northern BC in mind. Community borrowers are around and able to use the systems and books (although I think they pay a small fee for their card - I'll ask Jo).
I'm also curious, what happens when someone from outside comes to you and asks you to do research? I know they pay; is it something you do outside of your work hours? But are you using the system when someone else might need it?
D
Posted by Murphy on September 22, 2003 10:54 AM
Do you realize the absurdity of this "unauthorized use" ethical argument when you yourself are providing your readers with your ID and password to the NY Times so that they don't need their own subscription?
The cost of policing unauthorized use has to be balanced with the increased costs associated with the authorized use. Admittedly, at some point when dealing with limited resources, the unauthorized use becomes a real problem. This goes back to my old argument about compliance:
http://clubweb.interbaun.com/fenske/bloggo7.htm#dealing
Posted by Keith on September 22, 2003 05:25 PM
Keith: There is no absurdity here. I'm only supplying a generic pw so that you as the reader don't have to register for your own at the moment. There is no "subscription" here; I'm not paying for anything, it's free to anyone who wants to register. Completely and utterly different what what Cohen is discussing.
Posted by randy on September 22, 2003 08:24 PM
Actually, they aren't that much different. That's the problem with ethics: what seems at first glance to be absolute black and white can upon reflection change into shades of grey.
Here you are lending your registered *identity* even if you created the ID/password with the intention of sharing it among your readers.
This comment is brought to you by today's test application: Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5 SP2 running on Windows 95B.
Posted by Keith on September 22, 2003 09:57 PM
I think we can agree to disagree on this interpretation. If money was changing hands for use of the pw, it would be different.
I still believe ethics needs to be taught to grade schoolers. Why it isn't in our educational system is a mystery, but then, it never has been. Do they teach ethics in high school in Canada?
Posted by randy on September 22, 2003 10:34 PM
So if a public library card is free, then it's okay for me to borrow my neighbor's card, but if the card costs $5, then it's wrong?
Posted by Keith on September 23, 2003 10:34 PM
Again, not the same thing. The card is the responsibility of the card's "owner". If I lend you my card and you borrow a CD and damage it, it's my problem. I have to pay for it, and try to get you to reimburse me. Using my card, you could borrow some CDs, and try to sell them to a pawn shop, in effect stealing from the collection and committing, I believe, fraud. However, at the outset I shouldn't be lending you my card anyway - the contract most likely says that lending a card isn't permitted.
I see no parallel between what you can do with my card, and letting people use a generic ID and PW that costs nothing and only permits access to online materials for seven days. If you download an article using a generic ID I've set up, and then use it on your web site, and get in trouble with the NYTimes as a result, that's your problem, not mine.
So, that's all I'm going to say for now...
Posted by randy on September 24, 2003 10:53 AM
« hide comments
:: Well, I am proud, actually, but lately, my profession is doing what it can to make itself look, er, stoopid. First comes the librarian action figure, in which the action involves telling you to, basically, shut up. (Other superhero action figures save the world - our action figure tells you to stop talking.) Now comes word that OCLC, the Online Computer Library Center, is suing The Library Hotel in NYC for using the Dewey Decimal System as its theme. The Library Hotel divides each of its floors according to the DDC, meaning that each floor and room on that floor is dedicated to a specific subject in the classification.
OCLC owns the rights to the DDC, is concerned that people visiting the web site might think the hotel is connected with the owner of the classification system. From the hotel's website:
The Library Hotel in New York City is the first hotel ever to offer its guest over 6,000 volumes organized throughout the hotel by the DDC. Each of the 10 guestrooms floors honors one of the 10 categories of the DDC and each of the 60 rooms is uniquely adorned with a collection of books and art exploring a distinctive topic within the category or floor it belongs to.
show comments right here »
Is the OCLC going to become like the RIAA. If I choose to sort my bookshelf using Dewey can I expect a midnight nock on the door, with some clown accusing me of not being an actual library, but using a library system. That's one of the sillier things I've read, and thanks for pointing it out.
Posted by Morrie on September 21, 2003 06:14 PM
« hide comments
:: The stereotypical image of my profession has been reinforced with the debut of a doll wearing sensible shoes, a long, dull dress, and a cardigan sweater, and a moveable arm that "shushes" you. In July, Nancy Pearl, the librarian after whom the doll is based, advised the rest of us in the profession that how we would react to it would be based on how secure we are in our own work:
A better model might have been the Librarian Avenger. Look it up, baby!
Ms Pearl works for Seattle Public Library, and knew she wanted to be a librarian when she was 10 years old. She is the author of Book Lust: Recommended Reading For Every Mood, Moment and Reason. An interview with Pearl is available here. Meanwhile, the backlash from other librarians has been fierce, and the doll isn't even for sale until October.
But hey, judge for yourself! The manufacturer, Archie McPhee, also sells a ceramic smoking baby, Dick, The Albino Bowler, Pee Guy (really!), a pig catapult, and of course, Jesus Christ himself. What illustrious company!
Bottom line: because of the publicity regarding the doll, she'll sell more copies of her book than she could ever imagine, and McPhee will sell more copies of the doll than it could have predicted. Good for both of them, but forgive me if I pass on buying one myself.
show comments right here »
Christmas is coming Randy, maybe someone will surprise you with a doll. If that doll was as stereotypical of a race or cree it would be called racist or bigotted.
Posted by Steve40 on September 11, 2003 10:05 PM
While I agree that the Librarian Avenger might have made a better "action figure" doll this itself is another stereotype. The "alt" librarian, the sexy librarian, etc. -- it is just another image. I agree with Pearl that librarians should be secure about the work that they do and the services they provide. Besides it is obvious from the Archie McPhee website that they respect the work of librarians and Pearl is a scholar in her own right. I have never seen a profession that is so concerned over image. I think everyone should get over it already! As for stereotyping, the best way to fight stereotypes is to make a mockery of them which I believe this doll does.
Posted by Tami on September 12, 2003 09:26 AM
I think the doll, simply and elegantly, reinforces the dull, boring, no-sex-please-I'm-a-librarian, shushing, bookish image. Does being secure in our work mean we must chortle and chuckle about this doll? How can the best way to fight a stereotype be to prolong its image? And whyinhell must it be that if we think the doll is stoopid, then we are without a sense of humour??? When did this law come into global effect?
As for McPhee, read what Mark Pahlow, the owner of Accoutrements, the parent company, thinks about librarians:
BTW, no knocks on Pearl. In fact, she scares me. She's like, the librarian's librarian's librarian. It appears she lives, breathes and eats librarianship 24/7. Perhaps she is the perfect model for the doll, because too many of the rest of us don't live it 24/7, and quite obviously, have no senses of humour...
As for McPhee respecting librarians, don't get me started...
:-)
Posted by randy on September 12, 2003 11:39 AM
I'm surprised that you didn't think was funny, Randy. You're *otherwise* such a kewl dude. :-) I have the photos to prove it, heh heh.
Posted by cindi on January 25, 2004 08:44 PM
« hide comments
Do you own a PDA (Personal Digital Assistant)? I don't, but have been thinking about it for some time. Yet technology seems to move faster than one can keep up in the 21st century. Ephraim Schwartz, editor at large at Infoworld writes that General Motors believes the time may be approaching for you to get rid of your PDA.
General Motors announced last week that it will partner with wireless carrier Nextel to use Nextel’s Motorola cell phones with data capabilities to market a field-force management application to its commercial truck fleet customers. The announcement casts a shadow over the future of handheld devices in the business marketplace.The technology includes GPS, Java, and push-to-talk, and in tandem with ease of use, it becomes hard to chose a handheld over a handset. Cell phones are also considerably cheaper than PDAs.By selecting a cellular phone, GM in essence said no to Palm, HP, and Microsoft.
IT departments should consider the reasoning behind GM’s decision before recommending a handheld solution of their own.
Can someone slow technology down for just a few minutes, please? (From: Roland Piquepaille's Technology Trends)
show comments right here »
Until Telus or some other cell phone company can manage to get me cell coverage when I'm out here at the lake, no thanks, I'll stick with my PDA. It runs anywhere I am, at the cost of a couple of AA batteries. Even internet here is abysmal -- remember the bad old days of 28.8 K modem lines? That's where I'm at. I don't so much "surf" the net as "slodge"! --J
Posted by Jena on May 30, 2003 02:01 PM
« hide comments
:: From the Boston Globe comes this report on the Iraq National Library: " Contrary to widespread belief, the antique books of Iraq's National Library were not stolen by thieves last month but were removed for safe keeping by self-appointed guardians of Iraq's cultural heritage." (Thanks, Derryl.)
In my previous entry, I lamented cynically about the chances of the Province increasing funding to libraries in Alberta. I learned this morning, via a colleague, that this in fact is happening. At the recent Alberta Library Conference, the Minister of Community Development noted that this funding increase was just the start. This is good news, and is encouraging to know the government is seeing value in its investment in local libraries and library systems in Alberta.
:: In today's Edmonton Journal comes a column by Scott McKeen, titled: Civilization's safe after all. Libraries are cool again. Um, er, well...duh. Those of us in the profession have a news flash for Mr McKeen - our hallowed halls of employment were never uncool. Dude. McKeen observes that when All Things Pop Culture exploded (in the 90s, I presume), such as computers (read: Internet), home theatre, big box bookstores, instant gratification, and so on, the prediction was people would stop frequenting libraries, and by extension, their services. I've been a librarian for 25 years, and don't recall any particular point in time when my colleagues and I thought the sky was falling on our vocation and the buildings in which we work(ed). Read McKeen's column, and one might conclude that it's a modern miracle libraries didn't collapse from within when the Internet and Napster and stadium seat theatres and Digimon and all these fast food thrills took hold of Planet Earth. Well, public libraries at least. In academic and college libraries, we've spent the last 10 years doing our best to help students understand why the Internet isn't the Answer to Everything, and why their research and studies will take them to the library and its resources. *Cough*. (BTW, am I the only person who thinks the Edmonton Journal's web site really, really sucks? Like, badly? Unfortunately, the EJ website is the mirror image of all newspapers in Canada owned by the National Post.)
In fairness to McKeen, he does sing the praises of (public) libraries, and notes that Alberta municipalities are lobbying our provincial government for higher library grants. Um, I won't lose sleep waiting for that to happen very soon - increased library funding in Alberta could lead to a better educated populace. God forbid that might happen here.
:: Speaking of public libraries, this is such a cool idea, I wish someone in Canada would do it, too: The Third Annual New York Times Librarian Awards for public librarians across the United States. This year the awards have gone national in the USA.
:: An interesting "editorial observer" on William Gibson by Brent Staples in the 11 May 2003 NYTimes: A Prince of Cyberpunk Fiction Moves Into the Mainstream. (Note: ID and PW: podbay)
:: Have you been following the amazing success of Apple's iTunes? The iTunes Music Store sold over 1,000,000 songs (@$0.99US a pop) in one week. Read Rebecca's observations. Interestingly enough, hackers have already found a way to share the tunes among Macintosh owners.
show comments right here »
Re suckage of the Edmonton Journal website: you're not the only one who thinks so. My opinion? Like a Hoover. Like a Beam built-in.
Posted by Jena on May 13, 2003 11:41 AM
Sharing and streaming aren't quite the same anymore. Thanks to Napster and such, 'sharing' has some rather negative connotations. Streaming, on the other hand, is currently unsullied.
Also, with the latest patch for iTunes 4, you can only stream to people on the same subnet. No more streaming to your work machine from home. :-(
Posted by Zimmerman on June 1, 2003 02:17 AM
Sharing and streaming aren't quite the same anymore. Thanks to Napster and such, 'sharing' has some rather negative connotations. Streaming, on the other hand, is currently unsullied.
Also, with the latest patch for iTunes 4, you can only stream to people on the same subnet. No more streaming to your work machine from home. :-(
Posted by Zimmerman on June 1, 2003 02:18 AM
Sharing and streaming aren't quite the same anymore. Thanks to Napster and such, 'sharing' has some rather negative connotations. Streaming, on the other hand, is currently unsullied.
Also, with the latest patch for iTunes 4, you can only stream to people on the same subnet. No more streaming to your work machine from home. :-(
Posted by Zimmerman on June 1, 2003 02:19 AM
« hide comments
:: The talk in libraries these days (well, one of the "talks", anyway), is wireless - when are we going there, how can we make best use of it, how will it change what we do, and in the cases of many libraries already wireless, what has its impact been on what we do. The Wireless Librarian brings together resources for librarians and the experience of working in libraries with wireless technology.
Wireless technology has been with us since the 1890s, thanks to Marconi. In the October 1945 issue of Wireless World, Arthur C Clarke wrote a four-page article called "Extra-Terrestrial Relays: Can Rocket Stations Give World-wide Radio Coverage?" He proposed that satellites in geosynchronous orbit, spaced 120° apart at 36,000 feet, could achieve instant global communication coverage. Scoffed at initially, his proposed "relays", which would be part of orbiting space stations, evolved into today's communication satellites, or comsats.
Thanks to Derryl for bringing this web site to my attention.
show comments right here »
I didn't think one was allowed to talk in libraries. Doesn't that result in a lot of "shushing" from the bun-wearin' librarian?
Posted by Michelle on May 8, 2003 11:47 AM
For the record, I only wear my bun on Mondays.
Posted by Geoff on May 8, 2003 04:49 PM
« hide comments
:: Test Below, I mentioned the snow to which we woke up last Sunday. Well, that snow melted, we had a few warm days, and then yesterday it started snowing again. Oh yes, it's May 5th. Anyway, it's been snowing now for 24 hours. It's getting ridiculous. Check out my backyard and the front of my house at 8:30 pm MDT tonight. The grass is green, by the way, and until two days ago, I had plans to mow my lawn for the first time.
In the meantime, to remind me of warmer climes, I uploaded a few photos using a free photo gallery program called Web Album Generator. Thanks to Dania for telling me about this one.
:: Changing gears, this 1 May 2003 editorial in the Wall Street Journal got it right regarding the WHO's embarrassing and baffling travel advisory to Toronto re: SARS, noting that no new cases have been reported in Toronto since April 9th, and that all 144 cases have been traced to one person who had visited Hong Kong. The WHO did lift its travel advisory, and John Fund writes that the American Library Association will make the right decision regarding holding the joint ALA/CLA conference in Toronto, where up to 25,000 people are expected to attend. Thankfully, the day after the editorial appeared, ALA did just that.
:: Did you know that the planets, satellites and spacecraft in our solar system have been assigned IP addresses by the Interplanetary Internet (IPN)? If you are interested, participate in the ongoing discussion. (Thanks, Karlin.)
¦¦ The sickening, unfortunate news from Iraq continues unabated. In addition to 170,000 artifacts in the National Museum having been looted or destroyed, the Iraq National Library was in flames as well on April 13. The building was so thoroughly torched that heat still radiated 50 paces from the front door. From the April 13 NYTimes:
By tonight, virtually nothing was left of the library and its tens of thousands of old manuscripts and books, and of archives like Iraqi newspapers tracing the country's turbulent history from the era of Ottoman rule through to Mr. Hussein. Reading rooms and the stacks where the collections were stored were reduced to smoking vistas of blackened rubble
The US Administration has finally acknowledged the seriousness of the destruction and looting, and has pledged to recover and repair antiquities. One wonders if this will happen.
The destruction of libraries continued with the Islamic Library of Qur’ans set ablaze. Here is an account from the Arab News. I hope all librarians around the world will gather together to help Iraq rebuild its history.
¦¦ The war in Iraq has brought death to many innocents and soldiers, a shortage of supplies, food and water, and the serious need for humanitarian aid of all kinds. Unfortunately, anarchy continues to spread in the larger cities, including Basra.
There have been many photo galleries available with astonishing images of the events as they have unfolded in Iraq in the past three weeks.
Today in the Globe and Mail, I spotted this picture (© 2003, LA Times, taken by Don Bartletti of the Los Angeles Times, and winner of the 2003 Pulitzer Prize for Journalism: Feature Photography). I was saddened by what I saw: a looter damaging part of a library at the Basra Polytechnic College in order to steal bookshelves. The photo also reveals a gaping hole in the roof, damaged perhaps by mortar or debris after an explosion or bombing.For a librarian, this is perhaps the most disturbing image of all: a thoughtless assault on what belongs to everyone: information, knowledge, data, all that is contained on the shelves and via the computers of a library. Who knows what was going through this man's mind as he relentlessly threw the books to the floor of an already badly damaged and abandoned library. I wonder about the students, staff and faculty, there to teach, study and learn, their lives and work interrupted by war. For those fortunate enough to return to this college, it will be a long and arduous time of rebuilding and recovery.
In the past, librarians in first world countries have rallied to help librarians and libraries in less fortunate countries to salvage their collections when serious damage has happened to them, be it the result of fire, flooding, or in this case, war and anarchy. I hope that our larger library community is able to learn, in a short time, more about the extent of damage and loss faced by the library at Basra Polytechnic College, and other libraries in Iraq that may be suffering the same fate. Hopefully we can then respond with help to restore books to their shelves and dignity to their lives.
show comments right here »
i dont know how to say this but i thought that was very heart-felt and well-written. I think I may understand how you feel.
Posted by sharon on April 11, 2003 11:11 AM
Thanks, Sharon, I appreciate the kind words. The feeling of helplessness in situations like this for me as a librarian, was multiplied many times over today, having learned that the Iraq Museum of Antiquities has been gutted by looters.
Posted by randy on April 14, 2003 12:26 AM
Any time anything that is any sort of "record" is destroyed, it breaks my heart.
I revere books, and can't imagine ever abusing one.
This makes me very sad, indeed.
Posted by Jodi on April 15, 2003 06:42 AM
« hide comments
A library specializing in the history of artificial intelligence, whose collection was built over a 20 year period by one librarian in particular, together with 150 work stations and equipment worth over £500,000 was destroyed by fire in Edinburgh, Scotland, on Dec 14th. Ouch! As a fellow librarian, I empathize with how hard it must be to come to terms with such a loss.
In Florida, a manufacturer is producing a set of trading cards which feature portraits of victims of the Sept 11 attacks. He apparently has the approval of the families of each victim shown on the individual cards, which will sell for $2.50US each. Families will receive 8% royalties. The manufacturer denies he is cashing in on tragedy, but rather, is "providing a service to these families." Do you agree? I don't - I think it's really difficult to justify this. I might be more amenable if all the profits went to charity after costs, but that isn't possible when a for-profit enterprise is behind such a product.
Today in NYC, another seven new plans for the rebuilding of the WTC site were unveiled. My first reactions are not that positive, but I believe I need to study the designs further. The design from Richard Meier and Partners appears as an enormous hash mark from a distance, for example. You can see them here, and vote for your choice. Clicking on each entry opens another window with different views of the proposed sites, and each graphic within the new window moves while you are looking at it, a nice touch. (Warning: pop-up windows)
show comments right here »
Perhaps my taste is somewhat pedestrian, but the WTC site proposals look like ass. In fact, I find the first and last buildings so hideous, that I can't decide which one I hate more.
Posted by Limegirl on December 19, 2002 05:31 PM
I like the hash mark building! It looks like a giant, mutant Shreddie.
Posted by Pam on December 19, 2002 07:47 PM
A "giant mutant Shreddie"? Pam, you're a FREAK! :-) Limegirl, perhaps upon subsequent viewing you might change your mind. I think everyone will have initial negative feelings towards whatever architectural ideas are considered for the WTC site. Check them again in a few days and decide if you feel the same way.
Posted by randy on December 19, 2002 11:00 PM
Okay, okay. I can't argue with a giant mutant Shreddie.
Posted by Limegirl on December 21, 2002 09:11 AM
also up in smoke: the Belle Angele (lovely little club/gig-venue-type-place) and the Gilded Saloon (key Fringe Festival venue, and the place where some of britain's best-known comedians started out). they're tearing some of the damaged buildings down now. it's a pretty grim sight.
all the wtc proposals look a bit minging... and that *is* a giant mutant shreddie!
Posted by steph on December 30, 2002 01:42 PM
« hide comments
A fascinating interview with Jessamyn West, creator of Librarian.net, is available in the latest issue of Library Juice.
I don't know if this is the basis for a Broadway musical, but it's a heckuva start, as they might say in Minnesota. This was staged without the other library patrons having any idea what was about to happen, so it appears; watch their reactions. I love it - it's totally brilliant.
In other news, trying to load Gallery nearly reduced me to tears last night. Tonight I mucked around a bit more, downloading and unzipping binary NetPBM files (it's ok, my brain hurts too), and I did some CHMOD shyte. Finally, I submitted a long message on their user forum. I'm beginning to wonder, is it worth it?
So instead, I built my first PHP page last night. I have no idea what the coding means. And I played on my computer, over and over and really loud, Trusty Chords, by Hot Water Music. This is music to exorcise the demons. Listening wasn't enough - I blew the dust from my Telecaster, plugged it into my AmpCan, took a minute to decipher the chord structure of the song, and played along like I was in a punk band. HA!
Today, people at work reaffirmed my faith in humanity.
Isn't life sweet?
show comments right here »
I have a fab' PHP book you can borrow if you really want to. :-)
Posted by jennifer on November 25, 2002 11:09 PM
« hide comments
Lawrence Lessig, a Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, is currently leading a constitutional challenge of the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, which when passed, extended existing and future copyrights in the USA by 20 years. The campaign is called Free the Mouse, after Mickey Mouse - Disney's original copyright on Mickey Mouse expires in 2003. Lessig is arguing against the continual extension of copyright in the USA, which has happened 11 times in the past 40 years. The argument is that it prevents the flow of creative material into the public domain. There is much more to it, and the essential details are here.
Lessig has lost this case twice, and is now presenting to the US Supreme Court. The October 10th Economist features an update on Lessig's fight to reduce copyright protection.
The copyright issue is a tough one - as a librarian and musician, I can see both sides. When I copy an article 135 times for a class I'm teaching, I complete a log so that proper payment gets made (often not to the author, however). As a musician, I support downloading of music, but not for resale. I don't believe this makes me a hypocrite - musicians like Metallica's Lars Ulrich, who led the charge that brought down Napster, have not suffered greatly from downloading. Those that have suffered need to look in the mirror, and question the quality of their product before blaming the web.
For me, the issue is that through the Internet and downloading, I am exposed to more artists than would be humanly possible otherwise. In many cases, downloading of music has led me to purchase indie CDs I would have never heard of otherwise. The same applies to popular music of late. I borrow music from the public library, and if I like it enough, I'll buy it. If I don't like it enough, I might download one or two songs, and that's it. Why should I fork over hard-earned cash for a product that's subpar at best? I think this is the larger issue facing creators of artistic works.
Janis Ian wrote a convincing essay in favour of downloading, and followed it up with a second piece, on the fallout from her first writing. It's worth your while to read them. She notes, in her second piece, that there are "three operative issues that explain the entertainment industry's heavy-handed response to the concept of downloading music from the Internet". Let me share with you her first issue:
"1. Control. The music industry is no different from any other huge corporation, be it Mobil Oil or the Catholic church. When faced with a new technology or a new product that will revolutionize their business, their response is predictable:
a. Destroy it. And if they cannot,
b. Control it. And if they cannot,
c. Control the consumer who wishes to use it, and the legislators and laws that are supposed to protect that consumer." - Janis Ian
show comments right here »
I'm like you in that I see both sides of the argument here. However, what angers me is how the Canadian government sees fit to impose heavy surcharges on recordable media like CD-R's in the name of copyright protection etc. when everyone knows it's a tax grab/cash cow.
Posted by zuchris on October 16, 2002 11:57 PM
« hide comments